Courtney Roome
Rogerian Argument
Professor Eleanor Henderson
Professor Eleanor Henderson
18 is the beginning of Adulthood
Underage drinking is one of, if not the most popular threat to freshman college students. Inexperience, negligence, and/or peer pressure are the reasons that underage drinking is a growing problem on college campuses. Whenever discussed, this problem is frowned upon. People place the blame on the college authority, the fraternities or sororities, or even the local police when an underage student dies or suffers severe injuries from binge drinking.
I understand there are many health issues from underage drinking such as underdevelopment of the brain, future alcoholism or abuse, and serious injuries due to irresponsibility. There are also other serious issues that affect others such as sexual and verbal abuse, harassment, unplanned pregnancy, rape, and drunk driving. Over 1700 college students die every year from alcohol-related injuries, and 599,000 are unintentionally injured while under the influence of alcohol (Hingson). Alcohol often leads to unwise decisions as well. More than 696,000 students under the influence of alcohol are involved in physical assaults, and over 97,000 are victims of alcohol-related sexual abuse or date-rape (Hingson). Among those who do actively choose to have sex while under the influence, many do not use protection and regret it the next day, and over 100,000 students report having been too drunk to even remember whether or not they actually gave consent (Hingson).
The only honest way to face this uncontrollably escalating issue is to come to terms with reality. The reality is that no matter what, these underage students will find ways to drink; they will continue to binge drink until it is not as rebellious anymore. As soon as a college freshman enters the new world of living alone and making his/her own rules, drinking enters the mind. In this situation, these young adults have been forbidden to take a sip of alcohol all of their lives. The feeling of independence and temptation takes over their better judgment, which then leads to the serious injuries due to binge drinking. Author Carla T. Main discussed this effect in her article “Underage Drinking and the Drinking Age”. Main analyzes the brewing problem and possible solutions that will decrease the dangers of underage drinking.
Hence, by lowering the drinking age, youth consumption would come out in the open and binge drinking would be largely reduced or even eliminated. The second salutary effect of lowering the drinking age, the Initiative argues, would be educational: Colleges would be allowed to have open, frank discussions about responsible drinking. In other words, institutions of higher education could teach young people how to drink responsibly (Main 1).
Carla T. Main supports that by lowering the drinking age, the temptation within young adults would decrease and the students should also be able to receive educational facts by professors concerning drinking responsibly.
Unfortunately, if parents or more importantly the government realized that binge drinking exists because of the young population wanting to rebel against their authority figures, a solution to this problem would be obvious. Lowering the drinking age to 18 years of age instead of 21 will give more responsibility to the teenage population and instill the mindset of adulthood earlier. As this problem draws more attention and danger, many believe that setting stricter disciplinary action will help, when in reality it just makes it worse. In the article, “Effects of Raising the Drinking Age to 21 years in New York State on Self-Reported Consumption by College Students”, authors William H. George, Leif C. Crowe, David Abwender, and Jeremy B. Skinner address the issue of underage drinking on college campuses and agree that raising the age did not change the amount of alcohol consumed, but only where the students did the act of consumption. This article highlights the fact that after the change, students were forced to binge drink in places such as their cars. The only thing that the government had a positive impact on was endangering the students by enhancing their chances of drinking and driving (George et. al.1).
The young population in Europe has different social expectancies of one another. It is not normal to binge drink or get drunk on a regular basis. In the article “Alcohol in Europe – Public Health Perspective: Report Summary”, authors Peter Anderson and Ben Baumberg discuss the social norms in European countries for teenagers. According to surveys performed in these countries young adults say that on average, they only participate in getting drunk (4 drinks on a single occasion) about five times a year. However, this same audience admits to binge-drinking (5 or more drinks on a single occasion) approximately 17 times in one year (Anderson et.al. 485). This data compared to America’s young population is much different. College Students in America normally participate in binge-drinking every Friday and Saturday night and even some nights during the week, every week of the school year. This large difference between the two cultures is the temptation to rebel against authority in the American children and the larger amount of responsibility placed upon the European children. Since, the young adults of Europe are trusted with drinking responsibly and do not have to hide it. They do not have the drive to binge-drink because they consume a safe amount of alcohol when they socialize.
The beginning of one’s college career is one of the most traumatic transitions he/she faces. This issue of underage drinking is complicated to stop because so many young adults go through this life changing experience each year. It is difficult to avoid trouble for each new college student with problems that exist such as violations, health risks, and even with the law. This issue is very important and effects many people. Underage drinking directly influences the student and indirectly influences the parents, relatives, and friends of the student. The government must consider these ulterior reasons for changing the drinking age. They will see a new perspective on the problem and contemplate altering the law for the benefit of who it affects the most, college students.
Works Cited:
George, William H., et al. “Effects of Raising the Drinking Age to 21 Years in New York State on Self-Reported Consumption by College Students.” Web. 25 Apr. 2011.
Anderson, Peter, and Ben Baumberg. Alcohol in Europe – Public Health Perspective: Report summary. Drugs: Education, Prevention & Policy; Dec2006, Vol. 13 Issue 6, p483-488. Web. 13 Apr. 2011
Hingson, Ralph, et al., “Magnitude of Alcohol-Related Mortality and Morbidity among U.S.
College Students Ages 18-24: Changes from 1998 to 2001.” Annual Review of Public Health. 26 (2005): 259-279.
Main, Carla T. “Underage Drinking and The Drinking Age.” General OneFile. Gale, 2011. Web. 13 Apr. 2011.